Open Director Sight: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It was for installation in large gun turrets to be operated by the to direct the turret's guns, although an unsuccessful trial was conducted in 1918 to see if an altered design could be used to replace [[Directing Gun|directing guns]] as an alternative to proper director systems.<ref>''The Technical History and Index: Fire Control in HM Ships'', p. 19.</ref> | It was for installation in large gun turrets to be operated by the to direct the turret's guns, although an unsuccessful trial was conducted in 1918 to see if an altered design could be used to replace [[Directing Gun|directing guns]] as an alternative to proper director systems.<ref>''The Technical History and Index: Fire Control in HM Ships'', p. 19.</ref> | ||
It was also thought that it would be a helpful check that the trainer was on the correct target during individual firing. The foresight poked through the turret's roof armour through a small hole, and it moved under the actions of a sightsetter below it and by an elevation handwheel worked by the Officer of Quarters. The sightsetter had two drums – one marked in range and the other in elevation angles.When he places the desired range on the first drum, he can report the elevation indicated on the second to the gunlayers, who can elevate their {{DirectorH|p. 133}} | It was also thought that it would be a helpful check that the trainer was on the correct target during individual firing. The foresight poked through the turret's roof armour through a small hole, and it moved under the actions of a sightsetter below it and by an elevation handwheel worked by the Officer of Quarters. The sightsetter had two drums – one marked in range and the other in elevation angles.When he places the desired range on the first drum, he can report the elevation indicated on the second to the gunlayers, who can elevate their guns accordingly, checking their elevation against the black pointers on their elevation receivers or by a mechanical elevation arc.{{DirectorH|p. 133}} | ||
==Installations== | ==Installations== |
Revision as of 01:14, 22 September 2013
An Open Director Sight is a rifle-style peep sight the Royal Navy devised for fall-back use by a turret's Officer of Quarters when telescopic director sighting systems might have difficulty finding the target in haze or poor light.
Design and Purpose
It was for installation in large gun turrets to be operated by the to direct the turret's guns, although an unsuccessful trial was conducted in 1918 to see if an altered design could be used to replace directing guns as an alternative to proper director systems.[1]
It was also thought that it would be a helpful check that the trainer was on the correct target during individual firing. The foresight poked through the turret's roof armour through a small hole, and it moved under the actions of a sightsetter below it and by an elevation handwheel worked by the Officer of Quarters. The sightsetter had two drums – one marked in range and the other in elevation angles.When he places the desired range on the first drum, he can report the elevation indicated on the second to the gunlayers, who can elevate their guns accordingly, checking their elevation against the black pointers on their elevation receivers or by a mechanical elevation arc.[2]
Installations
22 sights were ordered in October, 1914 for complete or partial installation in 6 dreadnoughts and battlecruisers. This was soon followed by decisions to equip the entire Revenge and Queen Elizabeth classes. In July 1915, 77 more sets were ordered for general distribution in existing capital ships. Most of the installations (or at least procurement) were effected by January 1917.[3]
See Also
Footnotes
Bibliography
- Admiralty, Technical History Section (1919). The Technical History and Index: Fire Control in H.M. Ships. Vol. 3, Part 23. C.B. 1515 (23) now O.U. 6171/14. At The National Archives. ADM 275/19.
- Admiralty, Gunnery Branch (1917). The Director Firing Handbook. O.U. 6125 (late C.B. 1259). Copy No. 322 at The National Archives. ADM 186/227.