H.M.S. Conqueror (1911): Difference between revisions

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
|pend=06 (1914)<br>47 (Jan 1918)<br>95 (Apr 1918){{DittColl|p. 33}}
|pend=06 (1914)<br>47 (Jan 1918)<br>95 (Apr 1918){{DittColl|p. 33}}
|fg=white|bg=crimson}}</div name=fredbot:career>
|fg=white|bg=crimson}}</div name=fredbot:career>


==Alterations==
==Alterations==
Line 22: Line 20:
''Conqueror'' received a director sometime after the war started but prior to May, 1915.{{FCHMShips|pp. 9-10}}
''Conqueror'' received a director sometime after the war started but prior to May, 1915.{{FCHMShips|pp. 9-10}}


==Jutland==
==Career==
''Conqueror'' served in the {{UK-BS|2}} from at least December 1912, remaining with that squadron throughout the war.  In May 1919, the ships of that squadron were redesignated as the {{UK-BS|3}}.<ref>See {{UK-BS|2}} and {{UK-BS|3}} for citations.</ref>
 
===Jutland===
:{{Main|H.M.S. Conqueror at the Battle of Jutland}}
:{{Main|H.M.S. Conqueror at the Battle of Jutland}}


''Conqueror'' was under the command of Tothill.  She reported requiring 16 A.P. shells and 40 common shells after the battle, perhaps indicating her expenditure.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 522}}
''Conqueror'' was under the command of Captain [[Hugh Henry Darby Tothill|Tothill]] during the battle.  She reported requiring 16 A.P. shells and 40 common shells afterward, perhaps indicating her expenditure.{{UKJutlandOD|p. 522}}


The ship was one of very few which actually forwarded its Dreyer table plot sheets (to vice-Admiral commanding {{UK-BS|2}} on 2nd October, 1916) for the daylight action, though this may have been somewhat academic, as Tothill's cover letter stated "Very few ranges were taken.  Remarks outside of plot are those passed from Foretop to Transmitting Station."{{UKJutlandOD|p. 522}}
The ship was one of very few which actually forwarded its Dreyer table plot sheets (to vice-Admiral commanding {{UK-BS|2}} on 2nd October, 1916) for the daylight action, though this may have been somewhat academic, as Tothill's cover letter stated "Very few ranges were taken.  Remarks outside of plot are those passed from Foretop to Transmitting Station."{{UKJutlandOD|p. 522}}
Line 41: Line 42:


==See Also==
==See Also==
{{refbegin}}
{{WP|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Conqueror_(1911)}}
{{WP|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Conqueror_(1911)}}
{{refend}}


==Footnotes==
==Footnotes==

Revision as of 15:31, 10 July 2013

H.M.S. Conqueror (1911)
Pendant Number: 06 (1914)
47 (Jan 1918)
95 (Apr 1918)[1]
Builder: Beardmore, Parkhead[2]
Ordered: 1909 Programme[3]
Laid down: 5 Apr, 1910[4]
Launched: 1 May, 1911[5]
Commissioned: 23 Nov, 1912
Sold: 19 Dec, 1922[6]
Fate: Scrapped

Alterations

In late 1913, the ship's captain was asked to report on the merits of a spike that had been fitted to "B" turret's roof in its centre of rotation, intended to serve as a visual cue for the helmsman to find his own ship's bow from the C.T. when not steering by compass.[7] By January, 1914, a favourable report resulted in the Admiralty suggesting the same alteration to other ships with visibility problems from the conning tower where the steering position was on the centreline.[8]

Also in late 1913, the ship landed a Pattern 873 Zeiss stereo spotting telescope Mark II at Portsmouth in order to take on a Ross model of the same pattern for a three-month comparative evaluation.[9]

In October 1914, the ship was to be given 3 Pattern 1582 Electric Radiators to warm cabins whose stoves could not be used for heating them.[10]

Conqueror received a director sometime after the war started but prior to May, 1915.[11]

Career

Conqueror served in the Second Battle Squadron from at least December 1912, remaining with that squadron throughout the war. In May 1919, the ships of that squadron were redesignated as the Third Battle Squadron.[12]

Jutland

Main article: H.M.S. Conqueror at the Battle of Jutland

Conqueror was under the command of Captain Tothill during the battle. She reported requiring 16 A.P. shells and 40 common shells afterward, perhaps indicating her expenditure.[13]

The ship was one of very few which actually forwarded its Dreyer table plot sheets (to vice-Admiral commanding Second Battle Squadron on 2nd October, 1916) for the daylight action, though this may have been somewhat academic, as Tothill's cover letter stated "Very few ranges were taken. Remarks outside of plot are those passed from Foretop to Transmitting Station."[14]

Captains

Dates of appointment are provided when known.

See Also

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  2. ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  3. ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  4. ↑ Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. p. 28.
  5. ↑ Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  6. ↑ Dittmar; Colledge. British Warships 1914–1919. p. 33.
  7. ↑ Admiralty Weekly Order No. 634 of 7 Nov 1913.
  8. ↑ Admiralty Weekly Order No. 829 of 23 Jan, 1914.
  9. ↑ Admiralty Weekly Order No. 662 of 21 Nov, 1913.
  10. ↑ Admiralty Weekly Order No. 512 of 16 Oct, 1914.
  11. ↑ The Technical History and Index, Vol. 3, Part 23. pp. 9-10.
  12. ↑ See Second Battle Squadron and Third Battle Squadron for citations.
  13. ↑ Battle of Jutland Official Despatches. p. 522.
  14. ↑ Battle of Jutland Official Despatches. p. 522.
  15. ↑ The National Archives. ADM 196/42. f. 457.
  16. ↑ The Navy List (December, 1914). p. 296.
  17. ↑ The Navy List (October, 1915). p. 398c.
  18. ↑ The Navy List (October, 1917). p. 392p.
  19. ↑ The Navy List (December, 1918). p. 763.
  20. ↑ The Monthly Navy List (August, 1919). p. 763.
  21. ↑ The Monthly Navy List, (December 1920). p. 750.
  22. ↑ Mackie, Colin. ROYAL NAVY WARSHIPS.

Bibliography



Orion Class Dreadnought
  Conqueror Monarch Orion Thunderer  
<– Colossus Class Battleships (UK) King George V Class –>


Retrieved from "http://dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php?title=H.M.S._Conqueror_(1911)&oldid=70875"