Dreyer Table Mark III*: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:DreyerTableMarkIIIStar_operators_1918.jpg|thumb| | [[File:DreyerTableMarkIIIStar_operators_1918.jpg|thumb|360px|'''Fig. 1: Mark III* Dreyer Table operators, c1918'''<br>This shows a table with a Standard Bearing Plot as depicted in the 1918 Handbook but perhaps not really adopted in service. Notice how the organization of the components has changed from that in the [[Mark III Dreyer Table|Mark III table]].]] | ||
The '''Mark III* Dreyer Table''' was an updated version of the [[Mark III Dreyer Table|Mark III table]] that was being developed to equip light cruisers as the war ended. As a consequence, it saw no role in combat but likely served as an affordable and proven platform whose obsolescent design mattered less in lighter ships who were uncommonly equipped to have such amenities. | The '''Mark III* Dreyer Table''' was an updated version of the [[Mark III Dreyer Table|Mark III table]] that was being developed to equip light cruisers as the war ended. As a consequence, it saw no role in combat but likely served as an affordable and proven platform whose obsolescent design mattered less in lighter ships who were uncommonly equipped to have such amenities. By 1930, it was used in some [[Hawkins Class Cruiser (1917)|''Hawkins'' class cruisers]] in lieu of [[Dreyer Table Mark I*|Mark I* tables]] originally envisioned for them. | ||
==Development== | ==Development== | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding=" | The Mark III* table was slightly larger in width and depth than the Mark III table, but somehow lower in height. A key difference in the two models is that the Mark III*'s components were rearranged, likely in an effort to make them easier to serve. The Mark III*'s late date of development also meant that it likely was never envisioned in having early-model accoutrements (e.g.: the [[Early Dreyer Bearing Plot|early bearing plot]] or [[Brownrigg Keyboard]]). | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" align=right | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor=CEDFF2 align="center" colspan="2"|'''Overall Dimensions Compared to Mark III (1918)'''<ref>Dreyer Handbook, 1918 p. 90.</ref> | | bgcolor=CEDFF2 align="center" colspan="2"|'''Overall Dimensions Compared to Mark III (1918)'''<ref>Dreyer Handbook, 1918 p. 90.</ref> | ||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
| 4 feet, 3.5 inches (1.5 inches deeper) | | 4 feet, 3.5 inches (1.5 inches deeper) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Height of Range Rate Grid | | Height of<br>Range Rate Grid | ||
| 3 feet, 7.5 inches (2.5 inches higher) | | 3 feet, 7.5 inches (2.5 inches higher) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Height of top of dumaresq | | Height of<br>top of dumaresq | ||
| 4 feet, 2 inches (1 foot 7 inches lower) | | 4 feet, 2 inches (1 foot 7 inches lower) | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Motive Power=== | ===Motive Power=== | ||
Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
===Range Plot=== | ===Range Plot=== | ||
The Mark III*'s range plot was typical to other well-appointed models; a large surface placed on the right, with a [[Range Rate Grid|range rate grid]] positioned over it. Unlike the Mark | The Mark III*'s range plot was typical to other well-appointed models; a large surface placed on the right, with a [[Range Rate Grid|range rate grid]] positioned over it. Unlike in the Mark III table, however, the tuning handle was placed ''behind'' the table to free up space. The tables appeared so late in the war that their range plot fittings were probably always the most modern patterns found in the 1918 Handbook.{{INF}} | ||
'''Rate Grid''' | '''Rate Grid''' | ||
Line 83: | Line 84: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The extended range scales were likely fitted to tables as opportunity | The extended range scales were likely fitted to tables as opportunity arose around the time (1915?) such a modification was made to ???? (Brooks){{CN}}. | ||
===Bearing Plot=== | ===Bearing Plot=== | ||
Line 130: | Line 131: | ||
!style="color: white; height: 30px; background: crimson;"| ''Ship'' | !style="color: white; height: 30px; background: crimson;"| ''Ship'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan=2|[[Hawkins Class Cruiser (1917)|''Hawkins'']]||''Frobisher'' | |rowspan=2|[[Hawkins Class Cruiser (1917)|''Hawkins'']]||[[H.M.S. Frobisher (1920)|''Frobisher'']] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Effingham'' | |[[H.M.S. Effingham (1921)|''Effingham'']] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan=2|[[Emerald Class Cruiser (1920)|''Emerald'']]||[[H.M.S. Emerald (1920)|''Emerald'']] | |rowspan=2|[[Emerald Class Cruiser (1920)|''Emerald'']]||[[H.M.S. Emerald (1920)|''Emerald'']] | ||
Line 164: | Line 165: | ||
|[[H.M.S. Carlisle (1918)|''Carlisle'']] | |[[H.M.S. Carlisle (1918)|''Carlisle'']] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan=2|Aircraft Carriers||''Eagle'' | |rowspan=2|Aircraft Carriers||[[H.M.S. Eagle (1918)|''Eagle'']]** | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Hermes'' | |''Hermes''** | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan=3|Gunnery Schools||[[H.M.S. Excellent (Gunnery Training School)|''Excellent'']] | |rowspan=3|Gunnery Schools||[[H.M.S. Excellent (Gunnery Training School)|''Excellent'']] | ||
Line 174: | Line 175: | ||
|[[Devonport Gunnery School|Devonport]] | |[[Devonport Gunnery School|Devonport]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Rare Film of a Mark III* Table in Use== | |||
The 1927 film "The Battles of Coronel and Falkland Islands" has a sequence that shows rangefinding followed by 18 seconds of a Dreyer Table Mark III* in use, likely shot in the T.S. of one of the light cruisers used in making the film. | |||
<video id="hGYhpeoheRA" height="510" width="680" frame="true" position="center"/> | |||
In the first shot of the table, you are looking over the Range Plot number's shoulder as he (rather frenetically) works his plotting typewriter. Beyond him, you can see the Range Tuner (also in overdrive) as he positions the range rate grid and works his range tuning handwheel. The second shot depicts the Dumaresq operator, with the operator of the Main Drive beyond him. If this shot had panned left, we would have presumably seen the Bearing Plot, Wind Dumaresq and Deflection Totaliser. | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{refbegin}} | |||
*[[Dreyer Fire Control Table]] | *[[Dreyer Fire Control Table]] | ||
*[[Mark III | *[[Dreyer Table Mark III]] | ||
*[[Mark I* | *[[Dreyer Table Mark I*]] | ||
{{refend}} | |||
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
Line 185: | Line 194: | ||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
{{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
*{{ | *{{DreyerH}} | ||
*{{ | *{{BrooksDGBJ}} | ||
*{{ | *{{BrooksThesis}} | ||
*{{ | *{{RobertsAnatomyDreadnought}} | ||
*{{ | *{{THArgoAndDreyer}} | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:59, 2 June 2020
The Mark III* Dreyer Table was an updated version of the Mark III table that was being developed to equip light cruisers as the war ended. As a consequence, it saw no role in combat but likely served as an affordable and proven platform whose obsolescent design mattered less in lighter ships who were uncommonly equipped to have such amenities. By 1930, it was used in some Hawkins class cruisers in lieu of Mark I* tables originally envisioned for them.
Development
The Mark III* table was slightly larger in width and depth than the Mark III table, but somehow lower in height. A key difference in the two models is that the Mark III*'s components were rearranged, likely in an effort to make them easier to serve. The Mark III*'s late date of development also meant that it likely was never envisioned in having early-model accoutrements (e.g.: the early bearing plot or Brownrigg Keyboard).
Overall Dimensions Compared to Mark III (1918)[1] | |
Width | 9 feet, 5.5 inches (4 inches wider) |
Depth | 4 feet, 3.5 inches (1.5 inches deeper) |
Height of Range Rate Grid |
3 feet, 7.5 inches (2.5 inches higher) |
Height of top of dumaresq |
4 feet, 2 inches (1 foot 7 inches lower) |
Motive Power
As in the Mark III table, power for drawing the paper through the plots and for the the range and bearing clocks was provided by an electric motor equipped with a speed governor. Should power fail, an alternate hand-drive placed behind the table could be used. The person working this handle observed a stop-watch in a box behind an etched glass cover which revolved as he worked his handle. By keeping the etching in line with the stopwatch's hand, the correct speed to regulate the table's activity was delivered.
Dumaresq
The adapted Mark VI* Dumaresq in these tables had a free dial plate rather than the fixed dial plate found on the dumaresq in the Mark III table; flexible shafting permitted the indicator along the line of bearing to show the range rate set on the clock in the lower housing. A gyro-compass linkage maintained own heading as before.[2]
Range Clock
The range clock was underneath the dumaresq and the handle for setting its range rate also moved an indicator in a slot along the line of bearing in the dumaresq's dial plate.
The range clock's output shaft fed a tuning differential which drove the carrier for the red clock range pencil across the range plot and permitted a tuning handle to quickly position the pencil to the desired range. The tuning gearbox included a resettable count-up dial, and a hand-worked pedalling clutch allowed the tuner to select whether his tuning should be negatively fed into the Spotting Corrector to keep the gun range unchanged by the tuning.
Bearing Clock
As first designed for the standard bearing plot, no bearing clock was incorporated.[3][4] When the fitting of G.D.T. gear was decided upon, a bearing clock was added (see image to right).[5]
Spotting Corrector
The spotting corrector in the 1918 handbook featured:
- the customary handle to enter spotting corrections
- a resettable count-up dial for each incremental correction
- a pointer to indicate the total correction in place
- a pointer to indicate the current straddle correction to ease the interactions with the Dreyer Calculator
The final gun range from the spotting corrector was conveyed to:
- A worm shaft for the gun range pencil holder
- A pair of digital gun range counters; one nearby and one convenient to the Wind Dumaresq and Deflection Correction Link Gear.
- A commutator to relay gun range to control positions and conning tower
- A flexible shaft to carry gun range to the Range Master Transmitter on the bulkhead of the TS.
- A flexible shaft to carry gun range to the deflection drum (the second gun range counter was driven off this).
It seems a little disappointing to me that the gun range directly worked on the deflection drum but required 2 separate manual transfers to update the wind dumaresq and deflection correction link gear.
Range Plot
The Mark III*'s range plot was typical to other well-appointed models; a large surface placed on the right, with a range rate grid positioned over it. Unlike in the Mark III table, however, the tuning handle was placed behind the table to free up space. The tables appeared so late in the war that their range plot fittings were probably always the most modern patterns found in the 1918 Handbook.[Inference]
Rate Grid Probably only the most modern pattern of range rate grid.
Plotting Range Cuts Probably only the Range Typewriters, as they had been deployed widely in 1917.[6]
Range Pencils The tables probably always had a gun range pencil driven by the Spotting Corrector in addition to the traditional red clock range pencil.
Plotting Ranges | 2,000 - 16,400 yards (a +8,000 yard extended scale added later allowed plotting to 24,400 yards)[7] |
Paper width | 36 inches |
Scale | 400 yards/inch |
Paper speed | 2 inches / minute |
The extended range scales were likely fitted to tables as opportunity arose around the time (1915?) such a modification was made to ???? (Brooks)[Citation needed].
Bearing Plot
Deployment
Ships slated, in 1918, to receive Mark III* | |
---|---|
Ship to be Fitted | Commissioned/Completed |
Cairo | September 1919 |
Calcutta | August 1919 |
Capetown | February 1922 |
Carlisle | November 1918 |
Colombo | July 1919 |
Delhi | June 1919 |
Dunedin | October 1919 |
Durban | September 1921 |
The Dreyer Handbook of 1918 indicates a number of as-yet unfinished light cruisers were being equipped with these tables (see table to right).[8] The odd aspect is that contemporary procurement initiatives were placing less-capable Turret Control Tables in other light cruisers and even Mark I* Dreyer Tables in modern heavy cruisers.[9]
Given their dates of completion well after the June 1918 promulgation of the document outlining the intention to outfit them with Mark III* tables, it seems reasonable to conclude that all were equipped with tables soon after their completion, possibly with GDT gear from the outset.
By 1930, the allocation was as follows.[10]
Ships fitted with Dreyer Table Mark III* * = Modified Mark III* table ** = Without G.D.T. Gear | |
---|---|
Class | Ship |
Hawkins | Frobisher |
Effingham | |
Emerald | Emerald |
Enterprise | |
Danae | Dauntless* |
Danae* | |
Delhi | |
Despatch | |
Diomede | |
Dragon* | |
Dunedin | |
Durban | |
Capetown | Cairo |
Calcutta | |
Capetown | |
Colombo | |
Carlisle | |
Aircraft Carriers | Eagle** |
Hermes** | |
Gunnery Schools | Excellent |
Chatham | |
Devonport |
Rare Film of a Mark III* Table in Use
The 1927 film "The Battles of Coronel and Falkland Islands" has a sequence that shows rangefinding followed by 18 seconds of a Dreyer Table Mark III* in use, likely shot in the T.S. of one of the light cruisers used in making the film. <video id="hGYhpeoheRA" height="510" width="680" frame="true" position="center"/>
In the first shot of the table, you are looking over the Range Plot number's shoulder as he (rather frenetically) works his plotting typewriter. Beyond him, you can see the Range Tuner (also in overdrive) as he positions the range rate grid and works his range tuning handwheel. The second shot depicts the Dumaresq operator, with the operator of the Main Drive beyond him. If this shot had panned left, we would have presumably seen the Bearing Plot, Wind Dumaresq and Deflection Totaliser.
See Also
Footnotes
- ↑ Dreyer Handbook, 1918 p. 90.
- ↑ Handbook of Captain F.C. Dreyer's Fire Control Tables, 1918. p. 19.
- ↑ Handbook of Captain F.C. Dreyer's Fire Control Tables, 1918. Plate 7.
- ↑ Brooks. Dreadnought Gunnery, p. 177.
- ↑ Brooks. Dreadnought Gunnery, p. 177.
- ↑ Brooks. Dreadnought Gunnery, p. 173.
- ↑ Dreyer Handbook, 1918 p. 17.
- ↑ Handbook of Captain F.C. Dreyer's Fire Control Tables, 1918. p. 3.
- ↑ Handbook of Captain F.C. Dreyer's Fire Control Tables, 1918. p. 3.
- ↑ Pamphlet on the Mark III* Dreyer Table, 1930, p. 1.
Bibliography
- Admiralty, Gunnery Branch (1918). Handbook of Captain F. C. Dreyer's Fire Control Tables, 1918. C.B. 1456. Copy No. 10 at Admiralty Library, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
- Brooks, John (2005). Dreadnought Gunnery and the Battle of Jutland: The Question of Fire Control. Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 0714657026. (on Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk).
- Brooks, John (2001). Fire Control for British Dreadnoughts: Choices of Technology and Supply. Unpublished PhD Thesis. London: Department of War Studies. King's College, London.
- Roberts, John A. (1992). Anatomy of the Ship: The Battleship Dreadnought. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 085177895X. (on Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk).
- Dreyer, Frederic; Usborne, Cecil through Gunnery Branch, Admiralty. (1913). Pollen Aim Corrector System, Part I. Technical History and Technical Comparison with Commander F. C. Dreyer's Fire Control System. P. 1024. in Admiralty Library, Portsmouth.