Search results

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • <!-- NB: manual edits to ShipCareer are discouraged: edit the data block at the Class page's foot -- ...Imbros]], after she and the {{DE-Goeben|f=t}} sortied from the Dardanelles to raid Allied naval assets in the Aegean ib 29 January, 1918.
    2 KB (302 words) - 00:05, 18 October 2021
  • |comm=30 Sep, 1936{{ToL|New Ships for the Navy|Thursday, October 1, 1936, Issue 47494, p.9}} ...y with {{UK-Hostile|f=t}}, the first two ships of the class to be deployed to the Mediterranean.{{MoS|Tuesday, October 27, 1936, Issue 47516, p.7}} They
    3 KB (410 words) - 13:23, 24 February 2021
  • ...terms favourable to the Germans. This should be achieved by submarine and mine warfare, attacks on British trade with Scandinavia and sorties by the High ...me north. Three days before the operation was to take place it was decided to add the {{UK-BCS|1}} and {{UK-BS|3}}.{{UKNSMonoXVI|pp. 8-9}}
    9 KB (1,480 words) - 20:51, 12 May 2020
  • ...>{{ShipCareer|fullname=H.M.S. ''Raglan'' (1915)|fate2={{DE-Breslau}} and {{DE-Goeben}}{{DittColl|p. 102}} ...coast bombardment vessels to harass Germans on the Belgian coast, in order to frustrate their making naval use of it. All battleships were required eithe
    8 KB (1,285 words) - 21:58, 6 November 2019
  • {{pad|25px}}I<small>N</small> accordance with your signal, I have the honour to submit the following report on the action of 31st May, as far as H.M.S, "Ag | Altered course to 122°.
    6 KB (942 words) - 18:24, 4 April 2024
  • ...of the German ships {{DE-Goeben}} and {{DE-Breslau}} from the Dardanelles to challenge Royal Navy assets just outside in the Aegean Sea. ...} might break out of the Dardanelles. They had been officially transferred to the Ottoman Navy and renamed ''Yavuz Sultan Selim'' and ''Medilli'', but th
    10 KB (1,700 words) - 00:38, 18 October 2021
  • ...leave. The latter was due to go to Dunkirk after dawn and could be ready to for sea in two hours.<ref>Naval Staff. Naval Staff Monograph. Volume VI. Mo ...deliberate resemblance to submarines, which it was hoped would allow them to close on U-boats and sink them by gunfire or ramming.<ref>Naval Staff. Nava
    8 KB (1,272 words) - 13:49, 24 June 2021
  • ...the new flotilla mentioned is this one, as it is based in Lamlash}} Prior to February, 1914, it was known as the '''Lamlash Submarine Flotilla'''.{{AWO1 The flotilla is not only attached to the [[Clyde Local Defence Flotilla]], it is that flotilla's only asset, and
    37 KB (4,757 words) - 15:10, 19 January 2022
  • ...[[Grand Fleet]] through the end of the war. In February, 1919, she moved to join the new-fangled {{UK-DF|2}}. ...any special attachment or claim they had to the item(s) applied for.{{ToL|Ships' Bells for Sale|Saturday, Aug 10, 1935; pg. 6; Issue 47139}}
    6 KB (805 words) - 13:15, 22 December 2021
  • ...Channel Fleet, ''King Edward VII'' underwent a refit from 13 December 1907 to 24 February 1908.<ref>Report from Charles Beresford dated 18 April 1908 in ...replace them and coat bottom. The Vice-Admiral's flag was briefly shifted to {{UK-Dominion}}.<ref>"Grand Fleet Operations - Narrative of Events." Jelli
    6 KB (929 words) - 14:23, 27 April 2024
  • ...t receive news of the battle favourably, a fact substantially attributable to the lofty expectations they'd developed for a force as expensive as the Gra ...n warranted, at least in initial accounts, as continuing efforts were made to discover and enumerate true injuries inflicted upon the enemy.
    7 KB (1,122 words) - 22:05, 1 September 2022
  • ...modore [Roger John Brownlow Keyes, First Baron Keyes|Keyes]] in operations to protect the Belgian coast.<ref>See [[Southern Force (Royal Navy)]].</ref> The roster is comprised of ships taken from the Seventh Flotilla. It would, like the Seventh, operate initi
    25 KB (3,358 words) - 21:50, 24 March 2021
  • ...quently delayed till mid-December because of machinery problems with the {{DE-VonDerTann|f=t}}.{{GoldrickKing'sShips|p. 191}} ...reconnoitre Scarborough and Hartlepool, and reported weak defences and no mine fields.{{GoldrickKing'sShips|pp. 190-191}}
    14 KB (2,220 words) - 13:53, 1 November 2021
  • ...enty-four first-class T.Bs. and two cruisers based on Harwich, to be moved to Rosyth in event of war.<ref>"Torpedo Flotilla Organization" ''The Times'' ...Wireless Systems#Destroyer Set|Destroyer W/T Sets]], part of an initiative to equip 26 destroyers in three patrol flotillas.{{ARTS1912|Wireless Appendix,
    30 KB (3,989 words) - 15:49, 30 April 2023
  • ...fredbot:career>{{ShipCareer|fullname=H.M.S. ''Majestic'' (1895)|fate2=by {{DE-U21}} off Helles ...en recommissioned and for the Dardanelles Campaign she was despatched as a mine clearer. She was struck by two torpedoes while anchored off Gaba Tepe on 2
    14 KB (1,949 words) - 13:38, 1 January 2020
  • ...orpedoed and sunk by the German submarine {{DE-U9}} in the North Sea. The ships, part of the {{UK-CS|7}} (also known as Cruiser Force C) of the [[Southern ...al Navy]] were ordered to leave torpedoed and mined consorts to their fate to avoid a similar occurrence.
    24 KB (3,901 words) - 00:13, 13 March 2021
  • In October 1914, the ship was to be given 24 Pattern 1582 Electric Radiators to warm cabins whose stoves could not be used for heating them.{{AWO1914|512 o ..., 1914. Issue '''40597''', col D, p. 4.</ref><ref>Goldrick. ''The King's Ships were at Sea''. p. 27.</ref>
    8 KB (1,074 words) - 23:49, 18 March 2018
  • ...{{UK-Tipperary}} and {{UK-Mansfield}} will be joining, bringing the Tenth to the strength of two cruisers and twelve "M" class destroyers.{{SMNLMay15|p. Plans to add {{UK-Tipperary}} to the Tenth may have been altered, as she is now part of the {{UK-DF|3}}. {{
    53 KB (6,692 words) - 15:50, 30 April 2023
  • ...eastern end of the English Channel to prevent U-boats from gaining access to western areas. ...val base itself, and the Downs Boarding Flotilla. Command was transferred to Rear-Admiral [[Horace Lambert Alexander Hood|The Honourable Horace L. A. Ho
    21 KB (3,427 words) - 17:57, 21 May 2021
  • ...so badly mauled. {{UK-Chatham}} was "not applicable", as she had struck a mine and was under repair and so missed the battle. ...as represented in the battle by four light cruisers, with another detached to screen the {{UK-BCS|3}}. {{UK-Engadine|f=t}} operated in a detached manner
    26 KB (4,210 words) - 17:13, 31 May 2017
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)