Search results

| {{Template:ES-AlfonsoXIII}} | {{Template:ES-Espana}}

...d shortly before the [[Great War]], and [[H.M.S. Royal Oak (1914)|a modern dreadnought-type battleship was launched in that same year]]. * two {{Torp|18-in Mark IV|UK}}es, S.L. type

...ass''' dreadnoughts were designed as a follow-up to the revolutionary {{UK-Dreadnought|f=p}}. ...decrease the possibility of sinking from mine or torpedo attack. Unlike ''Dreadnought'' the ''Bellerophon'' class were given two tripod masts, with two control t

...rd class of dreadnought battleship after the [[H.M.S. Dreadnought (1906)|''Dreadnought'']] and the [[Bellerophon Class Battleship (1907)|''Bellerophon'' class]]. ...incent'', [[Bellerophon Class Battleship (1907)|''Bellerophon'']] and {{UK-Dreadnought}} classes with with [[18-in Mark VI** Torpedo (UK)|Mark VII*]] or [[18-in M

...d slightly from 3 degrees per second in previous mountings.<ref>Brooks. ''Dreadnought Gunnery and the Battle of Jutland'', pp. 45-46.</ref> In 1917, these tubes were firing {{Torp|21-in Mark II****|UK}}es.{{ARTS1917|p. 61}}

...mperature and C correctors, but they may have been identical to those in ''Dreadnought''. ..., [[King Edward VII Class Battleship (1903)|''King Edward VII'']] and {{UK-Dreadnought}} classes.{{TheSightM|p. 94, 108, Plate 47}}

...e given the age difference, the general system of wiring between the {{TS}}es in ships prior to [[Lord Nelson Class Battleship (1906)|''Lord Nelson'' cla ...(and perhaps, eventually, {{UK-Implacable}}) likely had fore and aft {{TS}}es in the pattern typical of similar ships from their period.{{HFCI1914|p. 50

...l to reach the maximum 3 degrees per second elevation rate.<ref>Brooks. ''Dreadnought Gunnery and the Battle of Jutland'', pp. 45-46.</ref> ...ber (perhaps about 5, as often provided elsewhere) {{Torp|14-in Mark X|UK}}es for use by boats.{{ARTS1909|p. 14}}

|cat=Dreadnought |type=dreadnought

...ell as a pair of [[Telaupad]]s for each gun. These led to six 2-way C.O.S.es in the 6-in TS which would dictate whether the given 6-in group's phones we In 1917, it was approved that capital ships of [[H.M.S. Dreadnought (1906)‎|''Dreadnought'' class]] and later should have Evershed equipment added to their {{CT}}, a

<div name=fredbot:career>{{ShipCareer|fullname=H.M.S. ''Dreadnought'' (1906)|fate2=Broken up |cat=Dreadnought

...was achieved by just a single revolution of the hand wheel.<ref>Brooks. ''Dreadnought Gunnery and the Battle of Jutland'', pp. 45-46. I am inferring the perform In 1917, these tubes were firing {{Torp|21-in Mark IV|UK}}es.{{ARTS1917|p. 61}}

In 1917, these tubes were firing {{Torp|21-in Mark IV|UK}}es.{{ARTS1917|p. 61}} In 1917, it was approved that capital ships of [[H.M.S. Dreadnought (1906)‎|''Dreadnought'' class]] and later should have Evershed equipment added to their {{CT}}, a

...''Lord Nelson'']], [[Minotaur Class Cruiser (1906)|''Minotaur'']] and {{UK-Dreadnought}} classes.{{TheSightM|p. 94, 108, Plate 47}} The general system of wiring between the {{TS}}es in ships prior to [[Lord Nelson Class Battleship (1906)|''Lord Nelson'' cla

...difficulty and some a roll of 16 to 18 degrees out to out."<ref>Brooks. ''Dreadnought Gunnery and the Battle of Jutland'', pp. 45-46, citing Captain Craig's repo ...S1911|p. 102}} though it should be noted that eventually cylindrical C.O.S.es were used for this sort of group switching.

In 1917, these tubes were firing {{Torp|21-in Mark II*****|UK}}es.{{ARTS1917|p. 61}} In 1917, it was approved that capital ships of [[H.M.S. Dreadnought (1906)‎|''Dreadnought'' class]] and later should have Evershed equipment added to their {{CT}}, a

...wing, these ships were to receive two [[18-in Fiume Mark III** H. Torpedo]]es each.{{ARTS1909|p. 14}} ...e but perhaps not likely that these ships were provided fore and aft {{TS}}es, as in similar ships of their period.{{HFCI1914|p. 50 & Plates 50 and 54(I)

...wing, these ships were to receive two [[18-in Fiume Mark III** H. Torpedo]]es each.{{ARTS1909|p. 14}} ...mouth}}'s [[Gunnery Officer]] in 1903, the ship at that stage had no {{TS}}es, no means of communicating ranges and deflections, and just a single 4.5-fo