Difference between revisions of "Ninth Destroyer Flotilla (Royal Navy)"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''Ninth Destroyer Flotilla''' was a formation of [[Destroyer|destroyers]] of the [[Royal Navy]].  The flotilla changed composition often as ships were damaged, retired or transferred.  
 
The '''Ninth Destroyer Flotilla''' was a formation of [[Destroyer|destroyers]] of the [[Royal Navy]].  The flotilla changed composition often as ships were damaged, retired or transferred.  
  
In 1916, it was comprised of [[Laforey Class Destroyer (1913)|''Laforey'' class destroyers]], whose torpedoes were only 64% likely to be dangerous to the enemy in limited test runs.<ref>''Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916'', p. 87.</ref>
+
==Pre-War Service==
  
==Outbreak of War, August, 1914==
+
==War Service==
 +
At the outbreak of war, the Ninth had seventeen "River" class destroyers led by [[H.M.S. Forward (1904)|''Forward'']] and [[H.M.S. Patrol (1904)|''Patrol'']].  It was deemed a "Patrol Flotilla" and served as part of the Nore Command with the Eighth flotilla, based out of Chatham.<ref>March.  p. 164.</ref>
  
==Battle of Jutland, June 1916==
+
In 1916, it was comprised of [[Laforey Class Destroyer (1913)|''Laforey'' class destroyers]], whose torpedoes proved only 64% likely to be dangerous to the enemy in limited test runs of that year.<ref>''Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916'', p. 87.</ref>
 
+
==After Jutland, 1916==
+
  
 
==Captains (D)==
 
==Captains (D)==

Revision as of 15:31, 24 January 2012

The Ninth Destroyer Flotilla was a formation of destroyers of the Royal Navy. The flotilla changed composition often as ships were damaged, retired or transferred.

Pre-War Service

War Service

At the outbreak of war, the Ninth had seventeen "River" class destroyers led by Forward and Patrol. It was deemed a "Patrol Flotilla" and served as part of the Nore Command with the Eighth flotilla, based out of Chatham.[1]

In 1916, it was comprised of Laforey class destroyers, whose torpedoes proved only 64% likely to be dangerous to the enemy in limited test runs of that year.[2]

Captains (D)

Dates of appointment given:

Footnotes

  1. March. p. 164.
  2. Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1916, p. 87.
  3. "Naval and Military Intelligence" (Official Appointments and Notices). The Times. Wednesday, 21 January, 1914. Issue 40426, col G, pg. 10.

Bibliography

  • Dittmar, F.J.; Colledge, J.J. (1972). British Warships 1914–1919. London: Ian Allan.

External links